ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 review index
- Page 1 – Overview
- Page 2 – Gallery, part 1
- Page 3 – Gallery, part 2
- Page 4 – Gallery, part 3
- Page 5 – Specifications
- Page 6 – GPU Tweak Utility
- Page 7 – Overclocking and Power Consumption
- Page 8 – OpenGL Tests
- Page 9 – Direct3D Tests
- Page 10 – Gaming Tests
- Page 11 – Conclusion
10 – ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580: Gaming Tests
Synthetic benchmark are cool (from a developer point of view) but many readers are not developers and then wish to see benchmarks based on real video games. I mainly used benchmarks included in game demos and then, dear readers, if you know other game demos that include a benchmark, just let me know.
5.1 Crysis (DirectX 10)
I used the integrated GPU benchmark (64-bit) option provided with Crysis demo.
Settings: default resolution (1920×1080 fullscreen)
Results: Average FPS for the TimeDemo Run 0.
77.87 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 |
| 76.19 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 DC2 |
| 74.46 FPS – Sapphire HD 6970 |
| 73.60 FPS – Sapphire HD 6870 |
| 73.55 FPS – Radeon HD 5870 |
71.12 FPS – ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 (GPU@926MHz) |
| 71.00 FPS – ASUS GTX 570 DirectCU II |
| 69.37 FPS – EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SC |
| 69.43 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 DCII TOP |
| 69.34 FPS – GeForce GTX 480 |
| 67.95 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP |
| 65.20 FPS – MSI N460GTX Cyclone |
| 49.76 FPS – ASUS Radeon HD 6670 |
| 35.02 FPS – ASUS GeForce GT 440 |
5.2 DiRT 2 (DirectX 11)
I used the benchmarking option provided with DiRT2 demo.
Settings: 1920×1080, 4X MSAA.
| 160.0 FPS – ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 (GPU@926MHz) |
| 151.4 FPS – EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SC |
| 129.91 FPS – ASUS GTX 570 DirectCU II |
| 123.44 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP |
| 121.6 FPS – GeForce GTX 480 |
| 115.53 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 DCII TOP |
| 94.26 FPS – Sapphire HD 6970 |
| 88.74 FPS – MSI N460GTX Cyclone |
| 88.14 FPS – Radeon HD 5870 |
| 85.54 FPS – Sapphire HD 6870 |
| 85.33 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 DC2 |
| 85.09 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 |
| 41.84 FPS – ASUS Radeon HD 6670 |
| 32.90 FPS – ASUS GeForce GT 440 |
5.3 Resident Evil 5 (DirectX 10)
I used the benchmarking option (DX10 version) provided with Resident Evil 5 demo.
Settings: 1920×1080. 4XMSAA
| 120.5 FPS – ASUS GTX 570 DirectCU II |
| 119.0 FPS – ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 (GPU@926MHz) |
| 118.0 FPS – EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SC |
| 116.6 FPS – GeForce GTX 480 |
| 116.0 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP |
| 115.6 FPS – Sapphire HD 6970 |
| 115.0 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 DCII TOP |
| 107.8 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 |
| 107.6 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 DirectCU II |
| 104.5 FPS – Radeon HD 5870 |
| 99.9 FPS – Sapphire HD 6870 |
| 86.4 FPS – MSI N460GTX Cyclone |
| 49.6 FPS – ASUS Radeon HD 6670 |
| 37.4 FPS – ASUS GeForce GT 440 |
Remark: the GTX 570 ahead of the GTX 580? Certainly a wrong reading of the score…
5.4 Aliens vs Predator (AvP) Benchmark (DirectX 11)
Aliens vs Predator or AvP is a Direct3D 11 benchmark with a touch of tessellation. See here for more details:
AvP DX11 Tessellation Battle: GTX 480 vs GTX 470 vs HD 5870 vs HD 5770.
Settings: Resolution: 1920 x 1080, Texture Quality: 2, Shadow Quality: 3, Anisotropic Filtering: 16, SSAO: ON, Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON, DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON, DX11 MSAA Samples: 1.
| 79.4 FPS – ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 (GPU@926MHz) |
| 71.6 FPS – EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SC |
| 64.3 FPS – Sapphire HD 6970 |
| 61.4 FPS – ASUS GTX 570 DirectCU II |
| 58.3 FPS – GeForce GTX 480 |
| 58.2 FPS – Radeon HD 5870 |
| 56.8 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 |
| 56.6 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 DirectCU II |
| 53.9 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP |
| 49.5 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 DCII TOP |
| 47.4 FPS – Sapphire HD 6870 |
| 37 FPS – MSI N460GTX Cyclone |
| 20.1 FPS – ASUS Radeon HD 6670 |
| 14.7 FPS – ASUS GeForce GT 440 |
5.5 Lost Planet 2 (DirectX 11)
Lost Planet 2 has been used for the test.
Settings: 1920×1080 fullscreen, test A.
| 92.2 FPS – ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 (GPU@926MHz) |
| 79.9 FPS – ASUS ENGTX580 |
| 75.7 FPS – EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SC |
| 70.4 FPS – ASUS GTX 570 DirectCU II |
| 60.2 FPS – EVGA GeForce GTX 480 |
| 55.36 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP |
| 52.1 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 DCII TOP |
| 48.8 FPS – MSI GeForce GTX 470 |
| 47.8 FPS – Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 |
| 46.9 FPS – ASUS Radeon HD 6950 DirectCU II |
| 44.7 FPS – ASUS Radeon HD 6950 |
| 42.3 FPS – Sapphire Radeon HD 6870 |
| 39 FPS – ASUS EAH6870 |
| 38 FPS – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC |
| 37.3 FPS – ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
| 23 FPS – MSI R5770 Hawk |
| 15.3 FPS – ASUS Radeon HD 6670 |
| 15.0 FPS – ASUS GeForce GT 440 |
5.6 Tom Clancy’s H.A.W.X. 2 (DirectX 11)
HAWX2 is a Direct3D 11 benchmark, promoted by NVIDIA, with tessellation.
Settings: 1920×1080, tessellation ON, AA: 4X
| Avg FPS: 185 – EVGA GTX 580 SC |
| Avg FPS: 185 – ASUS ENGTX580 |
| Avg FPS: 183 – ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 (GPU@926MHz) |
| Avg FPS: 183 – ASUS GTX 570 DirectCU II |
| Avg FPS: 181 – EVGA GTX 480 |
| Avg FPS: 175 – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP |
| Avg FPS: 168 – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 DCII TOP |
| Avg FPS: 137 – Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 |
| Avg FPS: 137 – ASUS EAH6870 |
| Avg FPS: 136 – ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
| Avg FPS: 134 – ASUS Radeon HD 6950 DirectCU II |
| Avg FPS: 133 – ASUS Radeon HD 6950 |
| Avg FPS: 132 – Sapphire Radeon HD 6870 |
| Avg FPS: 108 – MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5 OC |
| Avg FPS: 98 – MSI R5770 Hawk |
| Avg FPS: 70 – ASUS Radeon HD 6670 |
| Avg FPS: 60 – ASUS GeForce GT 440 |
5.7 MAFIA II (DirectX 9)
MAFIA II is a Direct3D 9 game, that includes a benchmarking tool. I used the high settings:
| 116.3 FPS – ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 (GPU@926MHz) |
| 106.5 FPS – EVGA GTX 580 SC |
| 93.4 FPS – EVGA GTX 480 |
| 91.7 FPS – ASUS GTX 570 DirectCU II |
| 89.5 FPS – SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6970 |
| 88.9 FPS – ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II |
| 85.1 FPS – ASUS HD 6950 DirectCU II |
| 83.3 FPS – ASUS GeForce GTX 560 DCII TOP |
| 72.5 FPS – SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6870 |
| 63.9 FPS – MSI GTX 460 Cyclone |
| 50.2 FPS – MSI R5770 Hawk |
| 48.9 FPS – MSI GeForce GTX 260 |
| 31.7 FPS – ASUS Radeon HD 6670 |
| 26.8 FPS – MSI GeForce 9600 GT Diamond |
| 25.6 FPS – ASUS GT 440 |
ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 review index
ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 gets the best performances in all tests!
A great GC for a great review, thanks JeGX!!!
Really Monster !!!
Pingback: FurMark at DreamHack 2011 | JeGX's HackLAB
how come yous did and go head to head with the msi 580 lighting ???
the difference between the reference GTX580 and the MATRIX is like the difference between mercedes E220 and E-Brabus .
Just posted my Furmark at 1047mhz = score 9279
Details for score ID = 218766
Do be a wimp and turn it up!
@Corwyn: yep nice score indeed. Is it a ROG Matrix? What is the GPU voltage?
Yes ROG GTX580 Matrix Platinum – The GPU voltage was 1.15
Core Clock 1047mhz
Core Voltage 1150mv
memory clock 4800mhz
(just joking about turning it up(was excited))
bonjour,
j’ai ma gtx580 matrix, elle chauffe avec fumark alors que elle tourne a 831, mem 2019, voltage 1150v
mais la temperature depasse toujours les 99 °
p-e que il n’y a pas assez de ventilation ?
pourriez vous m’aider.