My new GPU Zotac GF RTX 4090 Trinity review

Started by nuninho1980, October 27, 2022, 10:07:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nuninho1980

Hello!! I received this new card yesterday. 😍🤩😁🥰 I will upgrade GPU from GTX 980 Ti SC+ to RTX 4090 under few days and then I will benchmark. 😉

Watch https://youtu.be/yvGoFmk0CLQ

See you few days! 🙂


nuninho1980

I've knew this since tuesday. ;) I don't plug new GPU yet until maybe only sunday because I should clean dust on my ultra-tower. But Zotac box includes new NVIDIA 12VHPWR with only 3x8-pin adapter -> is this adapter normal (see 2 photos)?
You cannot view this attachment.You cannot view this attachment. 

--> Do you not congrat me despite my new top-end videocard? :/

nuninho1980

3 photos:







Is this adapter correct for avoid melt and burn? :)

Stefan


nuninho1980

Quote from: Stefan on November 03, 2022, 05:46:45 PMAllegedly the good adapters are labeled 300 Volt, the bad ones 150 Volt

https://www.google.com/search?q=12VHPWR+Adapter+300+Volt
Do I need to buy 300V 12VHPWR adapter? But do you forget my only 3x 8-pin?

Stefan


JeGX

GTX 980 Ti to RTX 4090... you're now good for the next ten years!
What is your PSU?

nuninho1980

Quote from: JeGX on November 03, 2022, 09:06:33 PMGTX 980 Ti to RTX 4090... you're now good for the next ten years!
Yeah! But I stay new card during +/-8 years. 😁

QuoteWhat is your PSU?
You see with attention (my 1st photo's today - bottom of my ultra-tower). :)

nuninho1980

ShaderToyMark v0.3.0

Watch - New GeForce RTX 4090 on "old" ShaderToyMark 0.3.0 with MSI monitoring

My result without any monitoring using:


Graphs with this new GPU and my past videocards:


This RTX 4090 performance is impressive!! Wooww! 😱😁🥰 Because my RTX 4090 is more than 10x faster than GTX 980 Ti on few apps/games/samples.

nuninho1980

@Stefan and @JeGX: Do you get any admiration and do you do any comment about my impressive result of STM?

nuninho1980

#11
VERY IMPORTANT for best plug 12VHPWR connector avoid melt and burn:
Before and after - my photos -> https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/12vhpwr-adapter-correct-for-my-zotac-rtx-4090.445311/#post-6071232
🙂

nuninho1980

ShaderToyMark v0.3.0 (cont.)

NOTE: 1%-2% CPU usage of FireStorm affected the performance and I don't use this Zotac tool anymore.

Watch - New RTX 4090 - higher score on "old" ShaderToyMark 0.3.0 with MSI monitoring

How do we get normal performance before benchmark - jump to the 58-second. 🙂

My higher result without any monitoring using and without FireStorm used:
You cannot view this attachment.

The RTX 4090 performance can get faster performance!?!! Wow! 😱😁🥰

JeGX

Nice score.

I just tested ShaderToyMark 0.3 and I got 2337 points (389 FPS) with a GeForce RTX 2070. So in this benchmark, a RTX 4090 is four time faster than a RTX 2070 (+418%)...

And FurMark scores? P1080, P1440 and P2160?

And the raytracing test?
https://www.geeks3d.com/20210219/vulkan-ray-tracing-tested-on-geforce-rtx-20-30-radeon-rx-6000-and-even-on-geforce-gtx/

nuninho1980

#14
Quote from: JeGX on November 17, 2022, 03:48:53 PMNice score.

I just tested ShaderToyMark 0.3 and I got 2337 points (389 FPS) with a GeForce RTX 2070. So in this benchmark, a RTX 4090 is four time faster than a RTX 2070 (+418%)...

And FurMark scores? P1080, P1440 and P2160?

And the raytracing test?
https://www.geeks3d.com/20210219/vulkan-ray-tracing-tested-on-geforce-rtx-20-30-radeon-rx-6000-and-even-on-geforce-gtx/
Thank you for "Nice score". :)

ShaderToyMark at minimum framerates:
my new RTX 4090 (~1320fps) is 11x faster than my old GTX 980 Ti SC+ (only ~120fps). :O :D

-> each 6 years - 2010, 2016, 2022 at minimum in fps:
- (not my) NVIDIA Titan X Pascal* (2016): ~175fps (?) vs (my old) NV GF GTX 480 (2010): ~40fps --- ~4x
- (my) NV GF RTX 4090 (2022): ~1320fps vs (not my) NVIDIA Titan X Pascal (2016): ~175fps (?) --- ~7.5x woww!! :O :O :D

--------------------------

-You quoted: "Lack of time... But reply posted, check your thread."
-Me: Yeah. Ok. I've deleted my "temp" post in "AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.11.1 released" thread. ;)

--------------------------

My results - CPU i7-12700KF@5.2GHz and GPU RTX 4090 with GF 526.86 - HQ running Win 10
- Furmark v1.31.0 - P1080 only*:
You cannot view this attachment.

- VK RT Pathtracing v1 - 1920x1080 rendered on Windows-desktop 1920x1200*:

spp | fps
----------
16  | 253
32  | 131
64  | 66
128 | 34
256 | 17

screenshot at 256-spp:



* - I can't work 2560x1440@60Hz but I blame the "bad" DP to VGA adapter. I can reach to 2560x1600@60Hz using DVI-I to VGA adapter on my old GTX 980 Ti. ;)

nuninho1980

#15
I edited on my post #14:
to change 2 resolutions screen (image rendered and desktop), the result and the screenshot about VK RT Pathtracing v1. ;)

JeGX

Impressive FurMark score!
I will use this result to update FurMark scores page
The best score I got is 17507 (292 FPS) with a Radeon RX 6800 XT.

nuninho1980

Quote from: JeGX on November 18, 2022, 02:38:15 PMImpressive FurMark score!
I will use this result to update FurMark scores page
The best score I got is 17507 (292 FPS) with a Radeon RX 6800 XT.
Thank much you! 😁