FurMark, GPU stress test
FurMark 1.15.2
 
Raspberry Pi GPIO connector explained
Raspberry Pi GPIO
Connector
Raspberry Pi 2 Model B Tested
Raspberry Pi 2 Model B
Tested
MadShaders 0.4.0 - Best Pixel Shaders in a Single App
MadShaders 0.4.0
 
GL-Z 0.2.0 - OpenGL information utility
GL-Z 0.2.0
 
ASUS GeForce GTX 980 Strix Review
ASUS GTX 980 Strix
Review

Posts Tagged ‘rasterizering processor’


Ray-tracing the way to go for game developers?

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by JeGX - 2008/08/08 at 09:36

Categories: Game Development   Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

TG Daily has interviewed Daniel Pohl, an engineer who is making some impressive progress in ray-tracing research, about Intel’s ray-tracing efforts.

Q: What is Larrabee from your perspective. What is the underlying architecture and the programming model?
A: Larrabee was primarily built as a rasterizering processor. Therefore you have support for DirectX and OpenGL. But it will also be a freely programmable x86-architecture. That means you could, for example, write your own rasterizer with your own API, a ray tracer, a voxel renderer or combinations of those. You could also use it for non-graphical applications that benefit from parallelization.

Q: What API is Intel using to showcase ray tracing demos?
A: We wrote our own API. The shading system uses a HLSL-like syntax that allows you also to shoot new rays within a shader. Using that API the programmer has no need to manually multi-thread the rendering and does not need to optimize the shading with SSE as this is done by the shading compiler automatically.

Read the complete interview here: Intel graphics update: Ray-tracing the way to go for game developers?

More news about Larrabee: Larrabee @ Geeks3D