OpenGL Geometry Instancing Test: Radeon vs GeForce
BenQ BL3200PT 32-inch
QHD Monitor
OpenGL Geometry Instancing Test: Radeon vs GeForce
Geometry Instancing
Radeon vs GeForce
(Test) Particle Rendering: Point Sprites vs Geometry Instancing based Billboards
Point Sprites vs
Geometry Instancing
MSI Kombustor
MSI Kombustor v3.5.0
and v2.5.8
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 512GB Quick Review
Samsung SSD 850 PRO
512GB Quick Test
ASUS N550JK Notebook PC Review (with GeForce GTX 850M)
ASUS N550JK Notebook
Review

Posts Tagged ‘rasterizering processor’


Ray-tracing the way to go for game developers?

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by JeGX - 2008/08/08 at 09:36

Categories: Game Development   Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

TG Daily has interviewed Daniel Pohl, an engineer who is making some impressive progress in ray-tracing research, about Intel’s ray-tracing efforts.

Q: What is Larrabee from your perspective. What is the underlying architecture and the programming model?
A: Larrabee was primarily built as a rasterizering processor. Therefore you have support for DirectX and OpenGL. But it will also be a freely programmable x86-architecture. That means you could, for example, write your own rasterizer with your own API, a ray tracer, a voxel renderer or combinations of those. You could also use it for non-graphical applications that benefit from parallelization.

Q: What API is Intel using to showcase ray tracing demos?
A: We wrote our own API. The shading system uses a HLSL-like syntax that allows you also to shoot new rays within a shader. Using that API the programmer has no need to manually multi-thread the rendering and does not need to optimize the shading with SSE as this is done by the shading compiler automatically.

Read the complete interview here: Intel graphics update: Ray-tracing the way to go for game developers?

More news about Larrabee: Larrabee @ Geeks3D