(Test) Particle Rendering: Point Sprites vs Geometry Instancing based Billboards
Point Sprites vs
Geometry Instancing
MSI Kombustor
MSI Kombustor v3.5.0
and v2.5.8
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 512GB Quick Review
Samsung SSD 850 PRO
512GB Quick Test
ASUS N550JK Notebook PC Review (with GeForce GTX 850M)
ASUS N550JK Notebook
Review
GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760 Compact Gaming PC Kit Review (GB-BXi5G-760)
GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760
Review
FurMark, GPU stress test
FurMark 1.14.1
 

Posts Tagged ‘hall of fame’


GPU PhysX Doesn’t get you to 3DMark Vantage Hall of Fame Anymore

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by JeGX - 2008/07/21 at 10:22

Categories: Benchmarks, Graphics Cards, NVIDIA PhysX   Tags: , , , ,

Futuremark has now decided to update its Hall of Fame to exclude all results using PhysX on a GPU, simply because this was not how they intended it to work.

With NVIDIA releasing their GeForce PhysX drivers, users of the PhysX accelerating GeForce cards were at an advantage over their Radeon counterparts, reason being that in a certain CPU test routine of the 3DMark Vantage benchmark, the physics processing abilities of the computer are tested, and since the physics API used happens to be PhysX, users of GeForce get higher scores despite not having a physics processor device such as an Ageia PhysX card. This differs from a real-life scenario where a GeForce accelerator does both graphics and physics and the overhead of physics processing affects the graphics processing abilities.

-source-