FurMark, GPU stress test
FurMark 1.14.0
 
(Test) Particle Rendering: Point Sprites vs Geometry Shaders Sprites
TEST: Point Sprites vs
Geometry Shaders
GPU Caps Viewer
GPU Caps Viewer 1.21.0
 
GPU Shark
GPU Shark 0.9.0
 
Particle Billboarding with the Geometry Shader (GLSL)
Particle Billboarding
Geometry Shader (GLSL)
Billboarding in the Vertex Shader (GLSL)
Billboarding
Vertex Shader (GLSL)

Posts Tagged ‘daniel pohl’


Ray-tracing the way to go for game developers?

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by JeGX - 2008/08/08 at 09:36

Categories: Game Development   Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

TG Daily has interviewed Daniel Pohl, an engineer who is making some impressive progress in ray-tracing research, about Intel’s ray-tracing efforts.

Q: What is Larrabee from your perspective. What is the underlying architecture and the programming model?
A: Larrabee was primarily built as a rasterizering processor. Therefore you have support for DirectX and OpenGL. But it will also be a freely programmable x86-architecture. That means you could, for example, write your own rasterizer with your own API, a ray tracer, a voxel renderer or combinations of those. You could also use it for non-graphical applications that benefit from parallelization.

Q: What API is Intel using to showcase ray tracing demos?
A: We wrote our own API. The shading system uses a HLSL-like syntax that allows you also to shoot new rays within a shader. Using that API the programmer has no need to manually multi-thread the rendering and does not need to optimize the shading with SSE as this is done by the shading compiler automatically.

Read the complete interview here: Intel graphics update: Ray-tracing the way to go for game developers?

More news about Larrabee: Larrabee @ Geeks3D


Ray Traced Quake Wars

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by JeGX - 2008/06/12 at 20:45

Categories: 3D Engines, Industry News   Tags: , ,


Read more…