<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeks3D.com &#187; Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeks3d.com/category/geeks3d/test-geeks3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeks3d.com</link>
	<description>3D Tech News and Pixel Hacking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>(Tested) Patriot Supersonic RAGE 32GB USB 3.0 Flash Drive</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20130313/tested-patriot-supersonic-rage-32gb-usb-3-0-flash-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20130313/tested-patriot-supersonic-rage-32gb-usb-3-0-flash-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atto disk benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrystalDiskMark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supersonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a quick test of Patriot Supersonic RAGE 32GB USB 3.0 flash drive. I use this flash drive to save my daily coding work and for this particular task (zip files of several hundred of MB), the Supersonic RAGE is pretty fast. Some pictures of the Patriot Supersonic RAGE 32GB: Now a quick benchmark with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20130313/tested-patriot-supersonic-rage-32gb-usb-3-0-flash-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Quick Test) New 3DMark Gaming Benchmark Available</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20130205/quick-test-new-3dmark-gaming-benchmark-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20130205/quick-test-new-3dmark-gaming-benchmark-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft DirectX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3dmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud gate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice storm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new 3DMark is available. You can download the Windows version from this page: 3DMark downloads. You have to call it 3DMark and not 3DMark13 or something else. Here is the explanation from Futuremark: This new version is cross-platform (Windows, Windows RT, Android and iOS devices) and includes three tests: Ice Storm (1280&#215;720) Cloud Gate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20130205/quick-test-new-3dmark-gaming-benchmark-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tested) A New Dawn: NVIDIA DX11 Tech-Demo for GTX 600 Released</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120723/tested-a-new-dawn-nvidia-dx11-tech-demo-for-gtx-600-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120723/tested-a-new-dawn-nvidia-dx11-tech-demo-for-gtx-600-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a new dwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct3d 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dx11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx670]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx680]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx690]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After some early details about this demo, NVIDIA has released A New Dawn, the first tech-demo for Kepler-based graphics cards. This Direct3D 11 demo targets GeForce GTX 670, GTX 680 and GTX 690 but it works also on Fermi-based cards. In 2002, NVIDIA released a demo called Dawn to demonstrate the power and programmability of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120723/tested-a-new-dawn-nvidia-dx11-tech-demo-for-gtx-600-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Quick Test) PLA Direct3D 11 Benchmark (GTX680 vs GTX580 vs GTX480)</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120606/test-pla-passion-leads-army-direct3d-dx11-benchmark-gtx680-vs-gtx580-vs-gtx480/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120606/test-pla-passion-leads-army-direct3d-dx11-benchmark-gtx680-vs-gtx580-vs-gtx480/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct3d 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dx11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx480]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx580]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx680]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passion leads army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PLA (or Passion Leads Army) is Direct3D 11 based on the Unreal Engine 3 game engine. The benchmark features hardware tessellation and PhysX-based physics simulations (flags, particles/explosions, etc.). Here is a quick test with three graphics cards: a GeForce GTX 680, a GeForce GTX 580 and one GTX 480. I didn&#8217;t included Radeon cards because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120606/test-pla-passion-leads-army-direct3d-dx11-benchmark-gtx680-vs-gtx580-vs-gtx480/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Ivy Bridge HD Graphics 4000 GPU: OpenGL 4 Tessellation Tested</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120506/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-gpu-opengl-4-tessellation-tested/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120506/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-gpu-opengl-4-tessellation-tested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TessMark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd 4000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivy bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opengl 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tessellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tessmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unigine heaven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The version 2729 of Intel HD Graphics driver has been released with OpenGL 4 support. It&#8217;s rather a big surprise even if it was somewhat foreseeable. So let&#8217;s see how the HD Graphics 4000 GPU (Ivy Bridge processor) handles the OpenGL 4 tessellation in the following tests: TessMark 0.3.0 and Unigine Heaven 2.1. - Testbed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120506/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-gpu-opengl-4-tessellation-tested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(PhysX Test) GTX 680 vs GTX 580 vs GTX 480 in FluidMark</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120502/physx-test-gtx-680-vs-gtx-580-vs-gtx-480-in-fluidmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120502/physx-test-gtx-680-vs-gtx-580-vs-gtx-480-in-fluidmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 08:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FluidMark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA PhysX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluidmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx480]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx580]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx680]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some readers asked me how much better is the GeForce GTX 680 in PhysX compared to previous GTX 580 and GTX 480. To bring an element of answer, I quickly tested the GTX 480, GTX 580 and GTX 680 with FluidMark 1.5.0 with different settings (on H67 testbed). Graphics drivers: R301.24. The GeForce GTX 480 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120502/physx-test-gtx-680-vs-gtx-580-vs-gtx-480-in-fluidmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laguna: Real-time OpenCL Path Tracer</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120502/laguna-real-time-opencl-path-tracer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120502/laguna-real-time-opencl-path-tracer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx 680]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd 7970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laguna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[path tracer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray tracing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laguna is a new small OpenCL path tracer (ray tracer) based on a precalculated blocks structure. I tested Laguna on an EVGA GeForce GTX 680 (R301.24) and a MSI Radeon HD 7970 (Cat 12.4) at a resolution of 800&#215;600 and 1920&#215;1080 (you can change settings in the scene.txt file): 1920&#215;1080 fullscreen: GTX 680: 12 FPS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120502/laguna-real-time-opencl-path-tracer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Ivy Bridge HD Graphics 4000 Extra Tests</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120430/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-extra-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120430/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-extra-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphics Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct3d 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dx11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd graphics 4000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivy bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As requested by some readers in the Intel Ivy Bridge HD Graphics 4000 GPU: OpenGL and OpenCL Tests article, here some additional tests of the HD Graphics 4000, the GPU embedded in the Ivy Bridge processor. AMD HK2207 DX11 demo HK2207 is a Direct3D 11 tech-demo for AMD Radeon HD 6900 series. Unfortunately, on Intel&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120430/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-extra-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Ivy Bridge HD Graphics 4000 GPU: OpenGL and OpenCL Tests</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120427/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-gpu-opengl-and-opencl-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120427/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-gpu-opengl-and-opencl-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd 4000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivy bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opengl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Ivy Bridge HD 4000 GPU test &#8211; Index Page 1 &#8211; Ivy Bridge Overview Page 2 &#8211; Ivy Bridge OpenGL tests Page 3 &#8211; Ivy Bridge OpenCL tests 1 &#8211; Ivy Bridge Overview Intel has officially launched Ivy Bridge, its new family of processors that combine a CPU and a GPU on the same [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120427/intel-ivy-bridge-hd-graphics-4000-gpu-opengl-and-opencl-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLBenchmark: New OpenCL Benchmark for Windows (Tested: HD 7970 vs GTX 680)</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120427/clbenchmark-new-opencl-benchmark-for-windows-tested-hd-7970-vs-gtx-680/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120427/clbenchmark-new-opencl-benchmark-for-windows-tested-hd-7970-vs-gtx-680/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clbenchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx 680]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd 7970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLBenchmark is a new OpenCL 1.1 benchmark for Windows (I don&#8217;t know if other OSes like Linux or MacOSX are or will be supported). CLBenchmark includes 17 different OpenCL tests. You can run them all or individually. CLBenchmark 1.1 Desktop Edition is an easy-to-use tool for comparing the computational performance of different platforms. It offers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120427/clbenchmark-new-opencl-benchmark-for-windows-tested-hd-7970-vs-gtx-680/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unigine Heaven 3.0 Released</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120308/unigine-heaven-3-0-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120308/unigine-heaven-3-0-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft DirectX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dx11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gl4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heaven 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opengl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unigine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guys at Unigine Corp have update their popular tessellation oriented benchmark for Direct3D (11) and OpenGL (4). This new version adds the support of Mac OS X 10.7+ as well as Intel HD 3000 processors. MacOSX and Intel HD 3000 do not support tessellation (I should release a version of TessMark without tessellation too [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120308/unigine-heaven-3-0-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Strong PSU is Required for EVGA&#8217;s GTX 580 Classified!</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120224/a-strong-psu-is-required-for-evgas-gtx-580-classified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120224/a-strong-psu-is-required-for-evgas-gtx-580-classified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphics Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ax1200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corsair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx 580]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermaltake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toughpower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few days ago, I received one of the best GTX 580 in the world: EVGA&#8217;s Classified model with 3GB of graphics memory. I plugged this big card on my testbed and&#8230; ouch! No way to start the system. The system starts and half a second later the PSU shuts down. WTF? The PSU is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120224/a-strong-psu-is-required-for-evgas-gtx-580-classified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LuxMark 2.0, OpenCL Benchmark for GPUs and CPUs</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120130/luxmark-2-0-opencl-benchmark-for-gpus-and-cpus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120130/luxmark-2-0-opencl-benchmark-for-gpus-and-cpus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd 6970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxrender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Around one year after version 1.0, the new version of LuxMark, an OpenCL benchmark based on LuxRender, is available. LuxRender is a physically based and unbiased rendering engine. Based on state of the art algorithms, LuxRender simulates the flow of light according to physical equations, thus producing realistic images of photographic quality. This new version [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120130/luxmark-2-0-opencl-benchmark-for-gpus-and-cpus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series Direct3D 11 Demo: Leo in Sneeze The Day</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120128/amd-radeon-hd-7900-series-direct3d-11-demo-leo-in-sneeze-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120128/amd-radeon-hd-7900-series-direct3d-11-demo-leo-in-sneeze-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft DirectX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct3d 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dx11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon hd 7900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sneeze]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD has released a Direct3D 11 tech-demo to showcase the performance of Radeon HD 7900 series. This tech-demo is based on a (home-made?) engine in version 3.3 (build 1). Seems AMD ditched the Trinigy engine used in the previous HK2207 tech-demo. This D3D11 demo uses Bullet for physics and Fmod for the sound. The Leo [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120128/amd-radeon-hd-7900-series-direct3d-11-demo-leo-in-sneeze-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Test) AMD Catalyst 8.921.2 RC11 for Radeon HD 7900, Big Performance Boost in OpenGL Tessellation (*** Updated ***)</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120123/test-amd-catalyst-8-921-2-rc11-for-radeon-hd-7900-big-performance-boost-in-opengl-tessellation-tessmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120123/test-amd-catalyst-8-921-2-rc11-for-radeon-hd-7900-big-performance-boost-in-opengl-tessellation-tessmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TessMark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8.921.2 RC11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GL_NV_copy_image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd 6970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd 7970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opengl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tessellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tessmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD has released a new release candidate of the upcoming WHQL driver (Cat 12.01). This new RC11 brings important performance gains in OpenGL tessellation, especially when high level of tessellation are required. According to the release notes, there is a big boost in TessMark 0.3.0 with insane level (tess factor of 64X): Performance highlights of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120123/test-amd-catalyst-8-921-2-rc11-for-radeon-hd-7900-big-performance-boost-in-opengl-tessellation-tessmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Test) ASIC Quality of GeForce GPUs</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120122/test-asic-quality-of-geforce-gpus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120122/test-asic-quality-of-geforce-gpus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphics Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu-z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest GPU-Z 0.5.8 includes a new feature that displays the quality of the GPU (ASIC quality) of recent graphics cards (GeForce GTX 400, GTX 500 and Radeon HD 7800, HD 7900 series). Not all GPUs on a silicon wafer have the same quality, some dies are finer than other. The finest dies are reserved [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120122/test-asic-quality-of-geforce-gpus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux: Mesa, Gallium3D, Nouveau and NVIDIA Drivers, OpenGL Test (GTX 280, GTX 480, GTX 580)</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120110/linux-mesa-gallium3d-nouveau-and-nvidia-drivers-opengl-test-gtx-280-gtx-480-gtx-580/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120110/linux-mesa-gallium3d-nouveau-and-nvidia-drivers-opengl-test-gtx-280-gtx-480-gtx-580/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreamlinux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallium3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx 280]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx 480]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesa3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nouveau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nva0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvc0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opengl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my recent programming sessions under Linux, I used NVIDIA proprietary and closed source drivers (64-bit version, it was under Mint10 64-bit) without too much difference with Windows ones. Few days ago, I decided to test Dreamlinux 5.0, a 32-bit Linux distro based on Debian 7 Wheezy. Dreamlinux comes with Nouveau driver (NouVeau?), the open [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20120110/linux-mesa-gallium3d-nouveau-and-nvidia-drivers-opengl-test-gtx-280-gtx-480-gtx-580/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee Pad Transformer, Quick WebGL Test</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20111209/asus-eee-pad-transformer-webgl-test-glsl-sandbox-shadertoy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20111209/asus-eee-pad-transformer-webgl-test-glsl-sandbox-shadertoy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glsl sandbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shader toy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tegra 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I quickly played with ASUS&#8217;s Eee Pad Transformer TF101, the one based on NVIDIA&#8217;s Tegra 2 processor (dual core CPU). The operating system is Android 3.2.1 (kernel 2.6.36.3 android@Mercury #1). Actually what I wanted to test is the 3D side and especially WebGL. With online WebGL tools like Shader Toy or GLSL Sandbox, you can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20111209/asus-eee-pad-transformer-webgl-test-glsl-sandbox-shadertoy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tested) cRARk, OpenCL Password Cracker for RAR files (***Updated***)</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20111019/test-crark-opencl-password-cracker-for-rar-files-radeon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20111019/test-crark-opencl-password-cracker-for-rar-files-radeon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opencl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: cRARk author just contacted me about the problem on NVIDIA hardware: As for fail on NVIDIA cards, it&#8217;s so simple in it&#8217;s written in the FAQ &#8211; you need to run driver-timeout.reg and reboot. (RAR kernel is so long and Windows can&#8217;t wait so much Indeed it&#8217;s simple when you know it cRARk is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20111019/test-crark-opencl-password-cracker-for-rar-files-radeon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 8 Developer Preview, VirtualBox (Quick Test)</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20110915/windows-8-developer-preview-virtualbox-quick-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geeks3d.com/20110915/windows-8-developer-preview-virtualbox-quick-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeGX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct3d 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directx 11.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi kombustor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtualBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=8012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like many other developers and geeks (according to what I read on twitter yesterday), I tested the developer preview of Windows 8. But I only wanted to do a quick and dirty test. Then I installed Win8 in VirtualBox: 1 &#8211; Download the 4.5GB iso from HERE. 2 &#8211; Mount this iso on a virtual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geeks3d.com/20110915/windows-8-developer-preview-virtualbox-quick-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
