<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radeon HD 5770 Has No Double Precision Floating Point Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/</link>
	<description>3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:04:05 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OpenGL 4.0 FP64 GLSL Shaders Will Run in Software Mode on Radeon HD 5700 - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-10468</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenGL 4.0 FP64 GLSL Shaders Will Run in Software Mode on Radeon HD 5700 - 3D Tech News, Pixel Hacking, Data Visualization and 3D Programming - Geeks3D.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-10468</guid>
		<description>[...] this news we learnt that Radeons HD 5700 (HD 5770 and HD 5750) have no double precision floating point [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this news we learnt that Radeons HD 5700 (HD 5770 and HD 5750) have no double precision floating point [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athlonite</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-9131</link>
		<dc:creator>Athlonite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-9131</guid>
		<description>@ agendaFX you can&#039;t make a rv830 chip out of anything other than an rv850</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ agendaFX you can&#8217;t make a rv830 chip out of anything other than an rv850</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATI GPUs - Seite 2 - SETI.Germany Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8773</link>
		<dc:creator>ATI GPUs - Seite 2 - SETI.Germany Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-8773</guid>
		<description>[...] da draussen,  nein, die 5750 und die 5770 haben kein Double Precision!  Siehe hier:  http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/rade...point-support/  Vergleiche das hier:  http://www.amd.com/us/products/deskt...fications.aspx  mit dem:  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] da draussen,  nein, die 5750 und die 5770 haben kein Double Precision!  Siehe hier:  <a href="http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/rade...point-support/" rel="nofollow">http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/rade&#8230;point-support/</a>  Vergleiche das hier:  <a href="http://www.amd.com/us/products/deskt...fications.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.amd.com/us/products/deskt&#8230;fications.aspx</a>  mit dem:  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agendaFX</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8160</link>
		<dc:creator>agendaFX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-8160</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not so surprising at all considering rv740 was rv770 shrinkdown, while this rv840/Juniper is real budget-mainstream card just as rv730 (hd4600 series was). They gone down similiar way when poor old rv530/535 (and later rv630/635) has only 25% of texturing power of their top model.

So after all we get decent performing dx11 hype kind of chip that&#039;s only half of gaming power of their bigger sibling. And good way to AMD to get rid of piled stocks of old chips like rv770, and rv790 especially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not so surprising at all considering rv740 was rv770 shrinkdown, while this rv840/Juniper is real budget-mainstream card just as rv730 (hd4600 series was). They gone down similiar way when poor old rv530/535 (and later rv630/635) has only 25% of texturing power of their top model.</p>
<p>So after all we get decent performing dx11 hype kind of chip that&#8217;s only half of gaming power of their bigger sibling. And good way to AMD to get rid of piled stocks of old chips like rv770, and rv790 especially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD5770 support Double Precision for Open CL applications - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8155</link>
		<dc:creator>HD5770 support Double Precision for Open CL applications - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-8155</guid>
		<description>[...] reports that the HD5770 doesn&#039;t support Double Precision for Open CL applications. Is this true?  http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/rade...point-support/   Where would this be useful? Is this feature important?  Why would the HD5770 not include it when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reports that the HD5770 doesn&#39;t support Double Precision for Open CL applications. Is this true?  <a href="http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/rade...point-support/" rel="nofollow">http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/rade&#8230;point-support/</a>   Where would this be useful? Is this feature important?  Why would the HD5770 not include it when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8013</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-8013</guid>
		<description>This is to be expected. Gamers don&#039;t really need double-precision pipeline and I doubt many games will be written requiring double-precision, not even for game physics. Even nVidia has stated that the lower-end Fermi chips won&#039;t have things like double-precision or ECC memory. This is just AMD playing it smart, they made it so that RV800 feature set more scalable so they can better target the different price brackets while maintaining the target margins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is to be expected. Gamers don&#8217;t really need double-precision pipeline and I doubt many games will be written requiring double-precision, not even for game physics. Even nVidia has stated that the lower-end Fermi chips won&#8217;t have things like double-precision or ECC memory. This is just AMD playing it smart, they made it so that RV800 feature set more scalable so they can better target the different price brackets while maintaining the target margins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimTex</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8008</link>
		<dc:creator>SimTex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-8008</guid>
		<description>Can hardly be marketing, this must enable them to use chips that otherwise would be defect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can hardly be marketing, this must enable them to use chips that otherwise would be defect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FMoreira</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8006</link>
		<dc:creator>FMoreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-8006</guid>
		<description>to have -&gt; double precision &lt;- in your floating point calculations......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to have -&gt; double precision &lt;- in your floating point calculations&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D3lta</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-8003</link>
		<dc:creator>D3lta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-8003</guid>
		<description>No DP in Opencl.  DP for what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No DP in Opencl.  DP for what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _sampah_</title>
		<link>http://www.geeks3d.com/20091014/radeon-hd-5770-has-no-double-precision-floating-point-support/comment-page-1/#comment-7999</link>
		<dc:creator>_sampah_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeks3d.com/?p=5783#comment-7999</guid>
		<description>Yeah.. It&#039;s marketing strategy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.. It&#8217;s marketing strategy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
